{"id":556,"date":"2022-10-28T16:56:23","date_gmt":"2022-10-28T16:56:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/atmos.ucla.edu\/csi\/?page_id=556"},"modified":"2023-05-08T00:40:15","modified_gmt":"2023-05-08T00:40:15","slug":"qtcm-sample-figures-version-2-1","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/atmos.ucla.edu\/csi\/qtcm-sample-figures-version-2-1\/","title":{"rendered":"QTCM Sample Figures (Version 2.1)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Many of the figures here are reproductions of those found in Zeng et al, 2000<\/a>. Two cloud- radiation packages were used and are denoted by clrad0 and clrad1.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Model climatological monthly mean precipitation for the perion 1982-98; using the cloud-radiation package clrad0. (a) Jan, (b) Apr, (c) Jul, (d) Oct. Contour interval 2 mm\/day, shaded above 4 mm\/day. (Zeng et al, 2000)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Model climatological monthly mean precipitation for the perion 1982-98; using the cloud-radiation package clrad1. (a) Jan, (b) Apr, (c) Jul, (d) Oct. Contour interval 2 mm\/day, shaded above 4 mm\/day. (Zeng et al, 2000)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Model-simulated Jan fluxes using cloud-radiation package clrad0 of (a) evaporation, contour interval 20 W\/m*m; (b) outgoing longwave radiation, contour interval 20 W\/m*m; (c) downward net surface energy flux, contour interval 50 W\/m*m. (Zeng et al, 2000)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Model-simulated Jan fluxes using cloud-radiation package clrad0 of (a) evaporation, contour interval 20 W\/m*m; (b) outgoing longwave radiation, contour interval 20 W\/m*m; (c) downward net surface energy flux, contour interval 50 W\/m*m. (Zeng et al, 2000)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Model-simulated Jan climatological winds at (a) 850, (b) 300 mb, using cloud-radiation package clrad0, in m\/s.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Model-simulated Jan climatological winds at (a) 850, (b) 300 mb, using cloud-radiation package clrad1, in m\/s. (Zeng et al, 2000).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Model Jul climatology using cloud-radiation package clrad0: (a) air temperature averaged between 500 and 200mb. Not Available (N\/A); (b) surface temperature (simulated ground temperature and observed SST), contour interval 5C; (c) relative soil wetness, contour interval 0.2; (d) 850 mb winds in m\/s.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Model Jul climatology using cloud-radiation package clrad1: (a) air temperature averaged between 500 and 200mb, contour interval 5C; (b) surface temperature (simulated ground temperature and observed SST), contour interval 5C; (c) relative soil wetness, contour interval 0.2; (d) 850 mb winds in m\/s. (Zeng et al, 2000).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Model-simulated monthly mean precipitation on the equator through the period 1982-98. Contour interval 2 mm\/day. (Cloud-radiation package clrad0). (Zeng et al, 2000).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Model-simulated monthly mean precipitation on the equator through the period 1982-98. Contour interval 2 mm\/day. (Cloud-radiation package clrad1).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
ENSO composite precipitation differences. Three warm events (1986\/87, 1991\/92, 1994\/95) minus three cold events (1983\/84, 1988\/89, 1995\/96). (a) Northern winter (Dec-Feb), (b) summer (Jun-Aug). Contour interval 1 mm\/day. (Zeng et al, 2000)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Dec – Feb. ENSO composite differences of surface zonal wind in m\/s. (Zeng et al, 2000)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Dec-Feb ENSO composite differences of surface sind stress in N\/m*m. (Zeng et al, 2000)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Model-simulated zonal wind stress on the equator from 1982-98, using cloud-radiation package 0, contour interval 0.03 N\/m*m. (Zeng et al, 2000)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Model-simulated zonal wind stress on the equator from 1982-98 using cloud-radiation package 1, contour interval 0.03 N\/m*m.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Correlations between Nino3 and model-simulated precipitation and surface temperature (observed SST over ocean), calculated using the monthly output for the period 1982-98.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Zonally averaged zonal wind for January using cloud-radiation package 0.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Many of the figures here are reproductions of those found in Zeng et al, 2000. Two cloud- radiation packages were used and are denoted by clrad0 and clrad1.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"custom-template-one.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-556","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/atmos.ucla.edu\/csi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/556","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/atmos.ucla.edu\/csi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/atmos.ucla.edu\/csi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atmos.ucla.edu\/csi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/atmos.ucla.edu\/csi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=556"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/atmos.ucla.edu\/csi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/556\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":612,"href":"https:\/\/atmos.ucla.edu\/csi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/556\/revisions\/612"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/atmos.ucla.edu\/csi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}